Originally Posted by 8684OT
|
You guys are dismissing masonevolution too quickly.
Suppose the following is true:
A) Whenever MM or Pearson gets hot, defenses double cover them causing a loosening of the perimeter defense; B) Whenever the perimeter defense loosens Acorn scores 10 or more points; C) Whenever A&B happens Mason wins
|
Pearson was our leading scorer in the GSU game; Mo tied with Cam as leading scorer and Pearson scored in double digits in the DU game. Cornelius did nothing in either. We lost both. It seems to me that B is looking more important than A in these hypotheticals. Sure pinpointing particular players is partly oversimplification, but there is some very compelling evidence that Cornelius is instrumental in the success of the team.
But really, for the most part, no one is paying attention to masonevolution because the Cornelius to Nolan analogy was criminally retarded.